Search for: All records

People learning American Sign Language (ASL) and practicing their comprehension skills will often encounter complex ASL videos that may contain unfamiliar signs. Existing dictionary tools require users to isolate a single unknown sign before initiating a search by selecting linguistic properties or performing the sign in front of a webcam. This process presents challenges in extracting and reproducing unfamiliar signs, disrupting the video-watching experience, and requiring learners to rely on external dictionaries. We explore a technology that allows users to select and view dictionary results for one or more unfamiliar signs while watching a video. We interviewed 14 ASL learners to understand their challenges in understanding ASL videos, strategies for dealing with unfamiliar vocabulary, and expectations for anin situdictionary system. We then conducted an in-depth analysis with eight learners to examine their interactions with a Wizard-of-Oz prototype during a video comprehension task. Finally, we conducted a comparative study with six additional ASL learners to evaluate the speed, accuracy, and workload benefits of an embedded dictionary-search feature within a video player. Our tool outperformed a baseline in the form of an existing online dictionary across all three metrics. The integration of a search tool and span selection offered advantages for video comprehension. Our findings have implications for designers, computer vision researchers, and sign language educators. 

Research has revealed benefits and interest among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) adults in reading-assistance tools powered by Automatic Text Simplification (ATS), a technology whose development benefits from evaluations by specific user groups. While prior work has provided guidance for evaluating text complexity among DHH adults, researchers lack guidance for evaluating the fluency of automatically simplified texts, which may contain errors from the simplification process. Thus, we conduct methodological research on the effectiveness of metrics (including reading speed; comprehension questions; and subjective judgements of understandability, readability, grammaticality, and system performance) for evaluating texts controlled to be at different levels of fluency, when measured among DHH participants at different literacy levels. Reading speed and grammaticality judgements effectively distinguished fluency levels among participants across literacy levels. Readability and understandability judgements, however, only worked among participants with higher literacy. Our findings provide methodological guidance for designing ATS evaluations with DHH participants.